Jump to: navigation, search

For an area, and for now, is this fairly OK for the quests? Comments please.

The landmarks and settlements should have better representation, just did this as a test until we have figured out the best way to extract quests from categories and what is wanted/needed when we present them. -- Zimoon (talk) 18:56, 8 October 2011 (EDT)

I think the page overall looks nice, although I'm not a real location nerd.
On another note, shouldn't this page be called "The Hill", since "Hill" just sounds like a landmark type and I'm almost certain it's called "The Hill" and is never referred to as "Hill" in game. It should show up as "The Hill" under the mini-map, although I must admit I haven't looked this up in-game (yet). --Ravanel (talk) 05:12, 9 October 2011 (EDT)
About the The question, I have not changed that because most of this cleanup-job is done without visiting the place. About The I know Rogue wants to have it as in-game, which makes sense. In this case Turbine use The Hill, but their history of inconsistency is well known ;)
My original question in this talk is whether it suffices to have this kind of presentation for quests at "area" level? And to have the more precise lists at lower levels? --Zimoon (talk) 09:31, 9 October 2011 (EDT)