Talk:Dwarves (Hostile)
We all know they're evil Dwarves... but the ONLY evil Dwarves out there are Dourhands... why do we categorize them as this instead of the obvious Dourhands, which at the moment is a redirect to a page that doesn't exactly tell you what "Dourhands" are - far from it? I would suggest moving this page to "Dourhands" and changing the category to "Category:Dourhands" as well. I don't think I've ever seen them labeled as those "evil dwarves" in-game. --Fedaykin 09:47, 19 January 2008 (PST)
- If you're referring to the names themselves, there are also "Gabilzan" and "Shornbeard" Dwarves. If you mean the game category, they're all filed under Dwarf/Dwarf Brigand.
- The re-direct is just plain wrong though.
- DancesInTrees 15:48, 19 January 2008 (PST)
- What I'm referring to is that you can just label any dwarves that are "evil" (mobs in-game) as "Dourhands", because even those Shornbeard and such dwarves are still Dourhands in terms of origin, and there are no evil Longbeards. As such, wouldn't it be better to move this page to "Dourhands" and have lore-related and other information on these dwarves on there? --Fedaykin 17:03, 19 January 2008 (PST)
- "even those Shornbeard and such dwarves are still Dourhands in terms of origin" huh? *goes to check on them* Ah I see, they all say Dourhand under the name - that doesn't show up on inspections. OK. DancesInTrees 00:28, 22 January 2008 (PST)
- What I'm referring to is that you can just label any dwarves that are "evil" (mobs in-game) as "Dourhands", because even those Shornbeard and such dwarves are still Dourhands in terms of origin, and there are no evil Longbeards. As such, wouldn't it be better to move this page to "Dourhands" and have lore-related and other information on these dwarves on there? --Fedaykin 17:03, 19 January 2008 (PST)