User talk:Ravanel

From Lotro-Wiki.com
Revision as of 17:43, 1 August 2016 by Spam (talk | contribs) (SUBST:Welcome, replaced: {{Welcome}} → {{SUBST:Welcome}})
Jump to navigation Jump to search

We look forward to having you here. Sounds like you'll make a great addition to the team. Don't worry too much about messing things up. We have the ability to revert your changes. Jump in and see where it leads you. There's always the Help section. I've been attempting to freshen that section up and make it more complete and beginner friendly. If you have any questions don't be afraid to ask. Check out the Community page and Contributors' Corner. --Rogue 16:56, 19 November 2009 (UTC)


>> Archive 2010 - Archive 2011 - Archive 2012 - Archive 2013 - Archive 2014 - Archive 2015 <<


spam filter test

I'm looking for the error message so i can figure out how to tweak the spam filter.

--Lotroadmin (talk) 20:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Wild, this only showed up when you used the >> or << .... so that filter seems broken, so I will just remove it. --Lotroadmin (talk) 20:26, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
No idea what you did, but I was able to add those links and text again. Thanks for looking into this! --Ravanel (talk) 01:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Patch Images

I saw your changes in File:182 Mumakil 400.jpg, File:182 group 800.jpg and File:182 Nazgul 800.jpg‎. I have no preference about it, I made the changes because to me it looks strange; the Category:Patches is used in every article about patches to put the list of patches in the article; adding to the list images is strange. As far as I can see, this was the first time that images were put in an article about the patch and I don't know if it's going to happen again. Promotional images seems OK.

Mogafi (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Heya! I should probably have written you a note on your talk page, but I was too lazy. :P I agree with you that the images definitely didn't belong in the Patches category: that's for patch (text) articles only. I don't mind either where it ends up either. You can always make Category:Patch Images if we get many more in the future and it gets useful to separate them. Sorry to bump in like that! --Ravanel (talk) 12:22, 7 July 2016 (UTC)